
I saw this movie opening weekend, this is just how long it takes me to blog. The fact that I even want to shows how much this film stuck with me. But I did have some problems with it.
I really love the visual from the poster, the house in three Rubik’s cubey layers. The story had three layers as well, one I liked well enough, one I adored, and one I found disappointing.
First is the conventional horror story setup. For someone who’s never really enjoyed that genre, I’ve seen far too many of its films. If this film had just been about five teenagers who go off to the woods to die one by one, it would still have been more clever and enjoyable than most of those.
But we don’t open with that story, although I would still consider it the A level. We open with two office workers starting the day with the most banal of morning office chatter: baby-proofing when there’s not even a baby yet. This B level was the one I found the most compelling: guys (and gals) whose job it is to kill off these kids one by one. And they know why they have to and believe in that mission, but they still have to find all sorts of ways to make themselves OK with it. This really worked for me. The actors were well cast; I really believed in who they were and they balanced the serious with the comedy handily.
I’m not sure if I consider it part of the A level or the B level – I guess it’s more properly where those two join – but there is a need to show these college kids for who they really are, then how they’re manipulated into the needed archetypes. For most of the movie, they are their archetypes; there are only two or three scenes that show them as themselves. But in this movie that’s enough. I can’t admire that economy of character building enough.
The other big wow for me was how elegantly the world building was done. Anyone who’s written spec fic knows the agony of trying to convey the mechanics of your world without being info dumpy. This movie does it in the most brilliant way ever: through humor. The jokes work as jokes, but they are also subtly building the world of those office workers and what they do and how they pretend to feel about it and how they really feel about it.
And the scene when the elevators keep coming: one of the coolest things I’ve seen all year (and I’ve already seen THE AVENGERS as I write this, so).
But. Well, I was really hoping for a different sort of ending. The Big Bad isn’t the office workers, it’s what are called the Old Ones. And it’s youth we’re offering up to them. The thing about old ones, they used to be young ones. And when Sigourney Weaver stepped out, I thought for sure the movie was going for that angle. Weaver, after all, is the lone surviving virgin from her own horror story. She knows just what these kids are going through because she’s been there.
But the story didn’t go there. Instead we get a scene that makes me squirm in every film it appears in (and that’s far too many): the person you have no reason to trust who’s telling you how it is. You know, the sort of person who would totally lie to you to manipulate you into doing whatever they want. And the main characters always just take it all as truth. Granted, here when shown the belt and the wrench our heroes say fuck it and pick the wrench. But I can’t really find the nobility in that; if I have to die I’m taking you all with me isn’t really my way of approaching the world. Not that the other option was so appealing, but was there really no third choice? There must have been, but no one looked. The kids were pressed for time, but what about all the others? Did they never try another option?
Because I have problems with the mechanics of this world. There are Old Ones who must be appeased, and they require five archetypal victims (or rather, four for sure and one optional one). And we are all familiar with these archetypes because they truly do appear in all of Those Sorts of Films. But. Well, there is a recurring image of other places that have already failed to appease the Old Ones, and then the moment when Japan, who was neck and neck with the Americans, suddenly fails.
I’m not familiar with the horror films of the other places (which failed anyway; I guess no one thinks they matter), but I have seen some Japanese horror, and those archetypes just don’t exist in their films. They don’t even exist in the scenario being run during the movie; their demon is targeting but is defeated by a room full of schoolgirls. So how important are these archetypes anyway? If only one country needs to succeed to appease the Old Ones, why doesn’t Japan have to play by the same rules? If each country has its own Old Ones, why are the others quiet provided someone, somewhere is satisfied?
No, it all just felt too contrived to me to have that last scene where the monster stomps the whole cabin. Which is a great visual. But I felt like the movie posited a question: why do horror films made by middle-aged or older always take such delight in offing the young? And then never made an attempt at an answer.
Whatever. I think I’ll just watch Bubba Ho-Tep again.
My husband and I are about halfway through watching The Sopranos (so yeah, I’m a little late to that party). My favorite character hands down is Silvio. Just the way he stands and tips his head; he has great body language. (Although for deadpan delivery and facial expression, that kid playing Tony’s son is phenomenal).